Dell Precision T1650

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision T1650
MotherboardDell Precision T1650  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 24 '20 at 23:02
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770S-$95
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 183
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 488
53% 422 Pts
64-Core 483
30% 483 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Asus(1043 0543) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.7.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.58% Terrible
Lighting 9.83
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 11.8
8% 11 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 13.9
10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.58%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 234 267 252 273 162 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 463
Write 436
Mixed 296
SusWrite 249
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 29.1
98% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 141
123% 187 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 118%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40
881GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 181 184 182 183 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 174
Mixed 117
SusWrite 182
124% 169 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 110%
Great: 108%
WD WD75 00AARS-00Y5B 750GB
480GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 91 91 92 92 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
49% Average
Read 80.5
Write 88
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 90.2
60% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3-1600 Hynix HMT351U7EFR8A-PB 8313 CL9-9-9 D3-1600 Hynix HMT351U7EFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.8% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 16.8
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T1650 Builds (Compare 959 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback