Lenovo 242941S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 242941S  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 242941S
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130201
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 24 '20 at 16:42
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3520M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 162
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 235
31% 233 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 5400M
Legend(17AA 21F5) 1GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9261
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
3.98% Terrible
Lighting 4.93
Reflection 5.65
Parallax 4.12
4% 4.9 fps
MRender 6.48
Gravity 4.87
Splatting 3.52
4% 4.95 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.98%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GH2ZB550
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 118 110 109 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 130
Write 130
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 114
72% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 0443 RMT3160ED58E9W1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.7% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 17.4
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 242941S Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 242941S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback