Asus PRIME Z270-P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive286% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-P  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 24 '20 at 10:08
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 94.5
1-Core 135
2-Core 262
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 497
65% 490 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 89%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
230GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1050 783 791 785 775 758 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
286% Outstanding
Read 2,265
Write 1858
Mixed 1,471
SusWrite 824
358% 1,604 MB/s
4K Read 65.4
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 90.5
296% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,588
DQ Write 803
DQ Mixed 1,075
830% 1,155 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 286%
Great: 355%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
4GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 441
Write 430
Mixed 372
92% 414 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 61.1
208% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 355
242% 296 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
49GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 239 209 235 233 188 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 439
Write 271
Mixed 299
SusWrite 249
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 56.6
189% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 200
179% 272 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Intel SSDSCKJW240H6 240GB
100GB free
Firmware: RG11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 198 198 219 220 218 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 349
Write 236
Mixed 254
SusWrite 212
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 96.3
4K Mixed 36.9
144% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 167
132% 185 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 91%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
422GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 42 41 41 41 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.1% Very poor
Read 38.7
Write 40.2
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 41.4
9% 40 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 14.9
4K Mixed 13.1
41% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 22.4
DQ Write 24.9
DQ Mixed 24.6
18% 24 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 97%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 88 89 88 87 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 165
Write 151
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 86.8
155% 120 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
118% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 59%
WDC WD20 EACS-11BHUB0 2TB
2TB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 120 120 120 120 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49% Average
Read 124
Write 112
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 119
134% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 24.6
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 23.8
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z270-P Builds (Compare 6,472 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-P - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $814
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback