Microelectronics G706

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive303% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicroelectronics G706  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X570 Pro4
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '20 at 22:29
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 80.9
1-Core 150
2-Core 297
94% 176 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 1,013
96% 794 Pts
64-Core 1,438
89% 1,438 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Zotac(19DA 7500) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 157
Parallax 168
136% 164 fps
MRender 202
Gravity 141
Splatting 113
120% 152 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 125%
Great: 123%
Nvidia Quadro P400
Dell(1028 11BE) 2GB
CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10% Very poor
Lighting 12.2
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 9.41
10% 10.8 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 15.1
10% 12 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
267GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 951 666 665 523 663 651 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
303% Outstanding
Read 2,519
Write 2,317
Mixed 1,490
SusWrite 686
391% 1,753 MB/s
4K Read 68.9
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 95
328% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,395
DQ Write 1,242
DQ Mixed 1,295
978% 1,311 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 303%
Great: 340%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
953GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1228 1230 1232 1224 1227 1216 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1421
Write 1,314
Mixed 1,014
SusWrite 1226
280% 1,244 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 76.6
264% 94.5 MB/s
DQ Read 637
DQ Write 796
DQ Mixed 271
328% 568 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 245%
Great: 255%
Sabrent Disk Device 129,986.5TB
203GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 145 149 114 147 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 165
Write 152
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 142
179% 136 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 0.7
312% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 101%
Sabrent Disk Device 129,986.5TB
29GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 98.5
Write 64.2
Mixed 66.1
SusWrite 1.3
69% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 101%
Sabrent Disk Device 129,986.5TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 97 107 103 96 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 120
Write 114
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 102
141% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
96% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 101%
Sabrent Disk Device 129,986.5TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 111 107 104 97 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 136
Write 138
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 105
156% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 32GB
3134, 3134, 3134, 3134 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
90.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 36.5
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 36.8
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G706 Builds (Compare 189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

System: Microelectronics G706

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $470
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback