Clevo Modified by dsanke

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive264% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemClevo Modified by dsanke  (all builds)
MotherboardClevo P870DM(-G)
Memory54.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190512
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateJul 22 '20 at 10:24
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 83.5
1-Core 141
2-Core 281
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 799
77% 632 Pts
64-Core 1,041
64% 1,041 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P5000-M (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 0879) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1657 MHz, MLim: 1501 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 392.56
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.7% Very good
Lighting 88.8
Reflection 108
Parallax 83.2
72% 93.3 fps
MRender 74.6
Gravity 85.5
Splatting 93.6
70% 84.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 75%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 719 594 631 576 581 561 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 2,113
Write 1,748
Mixed 1,294
SusWrite 610
321% 1,441 MB/s
4K Read 62.1
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 78.8
264% 90.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,459
DQ Write 1,232
DQ Mixed 1,301
987% 1,331 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 264%
Great: 296%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C14S4/16G KHX2400C15S4/16G KHX2400C14S4/16G KHX2400C15S4/16G 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 24.6
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 25.9
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 80%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Modified by dsanke Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

System: Clevo Modified by dsanke

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $221
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback