Dell OptiPlex 7040

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDell OptiPlex 7040
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7040  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190228
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateJul 21 '20 at 22:59
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
Socket 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 167
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 549
53% 437 Pts
64-Core 580
36% 580 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31% Below average
Lighting 38.7
Reflection 29.3
Parallax 36.3
32% 34.8 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 35.4
30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow KC400 512GB-$180
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.Y
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 162 381 245 219 258 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 143
Write 330
Mixed 284
SusWrite 270
59% 257 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 33
104% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 66.5
119% 235 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 108%
SanDisk SSD Plus 480GB-$40
186GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 48 47 46 115 115 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.8% Very poor
Read 253
Write 259
Mixed 242
SusWrite 66.3
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
6% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 76%
Asmedia ASM105x 250GB
54GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.1 3.7 3.5 3.7 3.9 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
0.99% Terrible
Read 18.5
Write 2.7
Mixed 5
SusWrite 3.5
2% 7.43 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 0.99%
Great: 82%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 139 140 144 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 149
Write 150
Mixed 79
SusWrite 140
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 84%
Seagate Basic 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9340
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 9.1 9.1 9.8 8.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 57.9
Write 9.5
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 9.8
17% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
26% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 67%
WD Elements 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.5 2.2 2.4 2.3 2.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
5.76% Terrible
Read 29.4
Write 1.7
Mixed 3.7
SusWrite 2.3
8% 9.27 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 5.76%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 029E0000802C CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 859B0000802C CT8G4DFS824A.M8FD 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
52.5% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 16.5
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 15.7
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 7040 Builds (Compare 5,257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7040

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback