PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus F2A85-V PRO (all builds) |
Memory | 9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20141127 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 12 '17 at 20:36 |
Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 65% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
59.2%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.3.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
18.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
80.9%
Excellent
|
||||
59.4%
Above average
|
||||
79.6%
Very good
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown F3-2133C10-8GAB 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
34.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples | 25x |
A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $467Bench 51%, 11,295 samples | 18x |
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples | 8x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon HD 8670DAMDBench 5%, 5,822 samples | 10x |
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples | 5x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $284 |