Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '20 at 20:37
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Memory 80.9
1-Core 153
2-Core 306
96% 180 Pts
4-Core 612
8-Core 1,153
105% 882 Pts
64-Core 1,547
96% 1,547 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
Asus(1043 0505) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1305 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.7.2
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.3% Average
Lighting 50.7
Reflection 64.8
Parallax 74.9
41% 63.5 fps
MRender 68.2
Gravity 52.4
Splatting 54.3
47% 58.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 120GB-$60
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 71 70 74 51 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 482
Write 168
Mixed 337
SusWrite 73
58% 265 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 22.4
84% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 56.2
82% 155 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 76%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
71GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 92 95 97 111 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 154
Write 159
Mixed 42.7
SusWrite 101
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 107%
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
202GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 71 72 72 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 68.9
Write 71.5
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 71.3
47% 64.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Thermaltake R022D408GX2-4000C19A 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 34.9
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 37.5
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,013
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback