Asrock 980DE3/U3S3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 980DE3/U3S3  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '20 at 17:47
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 79.1
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 144
59% 98.2 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 389
36% 304 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.19% Terrible
Lighting 2.63
Reflection 3.08
Parallax 0.88
2% 2.2 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.79 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.19%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$29
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 134 97 113 96 96 MB/s
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48% Average
Read 241
Write 275
Mixed 264
SusWrite 130
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 15.3
75% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 29.2
63% 129 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
91GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 88 89 91 93 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
63% Good
Read 131
Write 101
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 88.1
70% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
441GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 88 89 91 94 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 167
Write 137
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 88.1
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 114%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 8GB
2GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 2.8 2.4 2.4 2.9 2.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.6% Terrible
Read 17.4
Write 9.2
Mixed 5
SusWrite 2.4
10% 8.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.6%
Great: 7%
ST2000LM 007-1R8174 2TB
427GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 21 22 21 22 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 22.9
Write 24.4
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 21
22% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.1
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 200 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.2% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 7.9
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 980DE3/U3S3 Builds (Compare 182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback