MSI MS-17E1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive92.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GE75 Raider 8RE
MotherboardMSI MS-17E1  (all builds)
Memory18.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180919
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 20 '20 at 10:15
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 248
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 815
78% 642 Pts
64-Core 968
60% 968 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 1266) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7990
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 7.17
Reflection 73.5
Parallax 7.81
6% 29.5 fps
Gravity 6.63
Splatting 14.3
10% 10.4 fps
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 534 257 260 261 253 248 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 569
Write 330
Mixed 303
SusWrite 302
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 28.1
112% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 412
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 566
375% 446 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 126%
Hs-ssd-e2000 512G 512GB
432GB free
Firmware: HBAF28FT
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1489 1639 1598 1039 539 537 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 1,399
Write 1,496
Mixed 124
SusWrite 1,140
232% 1,040 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 73.6
241% 82.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,303
DQ Write 778
DQ Mixed 592
561% 891 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 247%
Great: 324%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
453GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 128 128 128 128 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 106
Write 114
Mixed 31
SusWrite 127
68% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD Kingston 99U5624-003.A00G 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.3% Very good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 22.6
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 24.8
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17E1 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback