MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3780 x 2160 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200420
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJul 19 '20 at 13:34
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$275
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 68.6
1-Core 152
2-Core 290
90% 170 Pts
4-Core 562
8-Core 944
92% 753 Pts
64-Core 1,440
89% 1,440 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390X-$340
CLim: 1060 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Lighting 70.7
Reflection 63.3
Parallax 84.4
58% 72.8 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 65.3
Splatting 78.9
58% 69.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.r
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 137 122 124 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
65% Good
Read 360
Write 137
Mixed 268
SusWrite 128
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 30.9
109% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 16.5
63% 142 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 65%
Great: 111%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
115GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 170 203 135 127 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 7
Write 303
Mixed 192
SusWrite 161
38% 166 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 18.8
92% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 119
100% 148 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 92%
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
646GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1241 1282 1166 1280 850 579 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1,674
Write 1,620
Mixed 1326
SusWrite 1,066
319% 1,421 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 95
4K Mixed 63.5
195% 66.8 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 335
251% 337 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 209%
Great: 311%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
30GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 61 60 59 59 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 57.4
Write 54.4
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 59.6
40% 53.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 65%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
72GB free
Firmware: 12.01B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 57.1
Write 57.6
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 40.9
38% 51.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$72
310GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 14 12 11 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.8% Good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 26.5
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 26.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,764 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,047
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback