Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z87X-UD3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 12 '17 at 04:23
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 223
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 562
58% 465 Pts
64-Core 573
35% 573 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
EVGA(3842 6288) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Lighting 154
Reflection 155
Parallax 134
126% 148 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 148
Splatting 113
102% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 114%
Great: 110%
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Zotac(19DA 1280) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.2% Poor
Lighting 29.4
Reflection 33.3
Parallax 37.2
24% 33.3 fps
MRender 39.9
Gravity 36
Splatting 28.3
28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 437
Write 398
Mixed 198
76% 345 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 33.6
4K Mixed 4.43
51% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 14.6
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 3.4
41% 88.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 86%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 178
Write 133
Mixed 136
112% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.2
88% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 89%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
146GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 105
Write 92.3
Mixed 91.3
72% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.27
72% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 0215 CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 0215 CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 0215 CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.5% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 12.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 10.4
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF Builds (Compare 938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $211
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback