MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200420
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 18 '20 at 23:51
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Memory 81.5
1-Core 149
2-Core 295
94% 175 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 883
90% 726 Pts
64-Core 1,308
81% 1,308 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNH256G8NT 256GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HTSAN106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 119 141 136 136 201 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 463
Write 169
Mixed 236
SusWrite 158
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 33.3
107% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 158
120% 164 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 95%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
39GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 311 304 294 305 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 423
Mixed 380
SusWrite 317
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 53.5
175% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 184
138% 186 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 102%
Great: 124%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
37GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 150 31 110 44 32 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 340
Write 207
Mixed 212
SusWrite 93.8
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 27.1
102% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 102
98% 154 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 100%
Asmedia ASMT1153e 320GB
298GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 33 33 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 17
Write 36
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 34
20% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
47% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 53%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
794GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 300 309 312 314 311 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
669GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 140 132 127 121 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 141
Write 134
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 131
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78%
Great: 108%
Asmedia ASMT1153e 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 148 152 152 153 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 160
Write 146
Mixed 84
SusWrite 150
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 104%
Asmedia ASMT1153e 3TB
434GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 110 111 112 110 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 110
Write 80
Mixed 69
SusWrite 109
68% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 16GB
3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
79.2% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 31.4
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 30.6
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,048
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback