bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel NUC6i5SYB
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '20 at 21:16
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6260U
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 74.1
1-Core 52.2
2-Core 100
48% 75.6 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 151
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 385 327 346 155 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 475
Mixed 374
SusWrite 304
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 46.3
152% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 344
259% 348 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 100%
Great: 131%
Asmt 2115 250GB
53GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 106 138 134 153 179 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36% Below average
Read 264
Write 76.3
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 133
30% 137 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 22.6
4K Mixed 10.1
46% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 29.9
DQ Mixed 32.4
35% 62.1 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 36%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64HZ-2G1A2 1315 CT8G4SFS824A.M8FJ 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.7% Good
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22.5
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback