Adloko J4205

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAdloko J4205  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '20 at 21:11
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium J4205
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Memory 34.6
1-Core 48.2
2-Core 97.6
34% 60.1 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 182
25% 183 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8336
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
2.36% Terrible
Lighting 2.53
Reflection 3.35
Parallax 2.44
2% 2.77 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 4.52
3% 3.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.36%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128G 128GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0327A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 36 32 30 45 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 337
Write 266
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 57
41% 185 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 5.6
24% 8.33 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 1.8
47% 109 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 79%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
15GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 9.2 8.4 8.5 9.4 7.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 33
Write 13.3
Mixed 16.3
SusWrite 8.2
21% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.6
174% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 17%
SDXC Card 124GB
116GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 27 23 11 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 24.5
Write 26.8
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 21.1
33% 24 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.3
90% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
29.6% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 10.9
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 229
18% 229 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical J4205 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Adloko J4205

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback