Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium J4205 1,095 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	Memory 27.1 1-Core 43.4 2-Core 86.6 29% 52.4 Pts	4-Core 140 8-Core 124 18% 132 Pts	64-Core 128 8% 128 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505 2,850 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8336 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	1.81% Terrible	Lighting 1.93 Reflection 1.88 Parallax 2 2% 1.94 fps	MRender 2.48 Gravity 1.87 Splatting 3.61 2% 2.65 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.81% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 128G 128GB 241 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0327A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 62 49 38 30 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Read 365 Write 308 Mixed 63 SusWrite 55.9 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 18.8 4K Mixed 3.9 41% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 127 DQ Write 157 DQ Mixed 7.9 43% 97.2 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	23.5% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 8.6 26% 9.27 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 3 9% 3.23 GB/s	Latency 273 15% 273 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium J4205IntelBench 33%, 1,095 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	1x

SSD
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	1x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16