bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel NUC6i5SYB
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '20 at 20:57
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6260U
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 83.6
1-Core 35.5
2-Core 127
50% 82.1 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 151
20% 150 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Graphics 540
Intel(8086 2063) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9.6% Terrible
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 11.8
9% 11 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 10.4
Splatting 16.4
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.6%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 266 309 261 180 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
70% Very good
Read 375
Write 351
Mixed 329
SusWrite 243
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 32.3
97% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 63.9
DQ Mixed 177
139% 201 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 70%
Great: 131%
Asmt 2115 250GB
53GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 164 149 57 79 90 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.8% Poor
Read 157
Write 103
Mixed 100
SusWrite 115
27% 119 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 22.7
4K Mixed 8.9
40% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 80.5
DQ Write 29.5
DQ Mixed 30.5
29% 46.8 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64HZ-2G1A2 1315 CT8G4SFS824A.M8FJ 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.5% Very good
MC Read 24
MC Write 39.2
MC Mixed 23.7
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 13.2
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback