PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 0.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | HP Compaq dc7700p Convertible Minitower (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0A58h |
Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20110817 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 17 '20 at 14:51 |
Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 26% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 6700-$230
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
37.1%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Radeon HD 5450
MSI(1462 2340) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.0
|
0.73%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
HFS120G32TND-N1A0A 120GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 62 62 63 64 MB/s
|
38.4%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
540GB free
Firmware: CC3E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 72 72 72 75 75 MB/s
|
46.3%
Average
|
|||
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$20
279GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 62 62 63 63 MB/s
|
42.9%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 41GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
|
14.2%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 6600Intel $90Bench 37%, 8,894 samples | 4x |
Core2 6400IntelBench 35%, 5,556 samples | 4x |
Core2 6300Intel $40Bench 34%, 5,234 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon HD 5400ATIBench 1%, 10,400 samples | 2x |
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples | 1x |
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 45% - Average | Total price: $128 |