TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 EVO  (all builds)
Memory16.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '20 at 11:03
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$30
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 106
2-Core 212
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 403
53% 398 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 79.6%
 Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Lighting 69.5
Reflection 67.8
Parallax 59.6
57% 65.6 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 65.5
Splatting 68.2
56% 68.2 fps
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 56.4%
 Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 214 98 52 10 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 342
Write 227
Mixed 252
SusWrite 96
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 18.2
86% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 89.7
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 22.9
42% 81.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 50.3%
 Great: 90%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
805GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 90 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 78.5
Write 65.8
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 88
47% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 47.7%
 Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 04CD F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 029E CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 04CD F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048, 8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 15.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 52%
 Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 604 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel  $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples237x
Core i5-2500KIntel  $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples129x
Core i7-2600Intel  $130Bench 67%, 185,630 samples80x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples44x
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples39x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples30x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples28x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples26x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples22x
RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples25x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples22x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples13x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $662
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback