MSI MS-16L4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GT63 Titan 8RG
MotherboardMSI MS-16L4  (all builds)
Memory60.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '20 at 03:56
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 128
2-Core 254
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 747
77% 623 Pts
64-Core 966
60% 966 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1218) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 134
Reflection 144
Parallax 134
109% 137 fps
Gravity 129
Splatting 104
102% 117 fps
Poor: 66% Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS1TMTE220S 1TB
825GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42B4SAUA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1053 543 461 464 466 468 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1,852
Write 1,619
Mixed 1,348
SusWrite 576
301% 1,349 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 72.5
241% 84.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,204
DQ Write 748
DQ Mixed 467
485% 807 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 228%
Great: 359%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
912GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 121 125 124 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 126
Write 127
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 123
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2666 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 28.8
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 28.7
82% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16L4 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI MS-16L4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback