Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$178 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Memory 86 1-Core 81.7 2-Core 142 63% 103 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 332 33% 271 Pts	64-Core 408 25% 408 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 74%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
R7SL240G 240GB 195 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0303A SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 132 72 80 70 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 457 Write 372 Mixed 340 SusWrite 104 71% 318 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 27.1 4K Mixed 20.1 73% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 291 DQ Write 256 DQ Mixed 230 185% 259 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 138 119 123 140 131 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Read 130 Write 139 Mixed 90 SusWrite 132 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 9905471-011.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 16GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	42.5% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 14 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 12.4 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 71.2 56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

RAM
CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 8GBCorsairBench 48%, 1,087 samples	8x
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 24GBUnknownBench 51%, 6 samples	5x
F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 1,020 samples	4x

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $474

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16