TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Xen HVM domU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemXen HVM domU  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.9 GB free of 11.9922 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1536 x 864 - 32 Bit colors, , 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200603
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJul 15 '20 at 19:45
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8256
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.1% Average
Memory 32.4
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 197
55% 109 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 340
46% 342 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xensrc PVDISK 21GB
7GB free
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 362
Write 201
Mixed 277
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 9.8
34% 9.73 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 51%
Citrix Virtual Disk 129GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PVS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 123 90 112 121 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 180
Write 144
Mixed 147
SusWrite 115
109% 146 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.5
463% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑
This bench: 84.7%
 Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x11GB
1 of 1 slots used
11GB DIMM RAM
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
52.5% Above average
MC Read 15
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 21.2
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 241
17% 241 ns
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 52.5%
 Great: 138%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical HVM domU Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

System: Xen HVM domU

CPU
Xeon E5-2623 v4IntelBench 59%, 42 samples16x
Xeon Gold 5315YIntelBench 71%, 25 samples14x
Xeon Silver 4215RIntelBench 62%, 17 samples13x
GPU
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples9x
RTX A4000NvidiaBench 132%, 4,246 samples7x
Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 131%, 1,749 samples6x
SSD
PVDISK 268GBXensrcBench 53%, 95 samples53x
PVDISK 2TBXensrcBench 50%, 16 samples5x
Virtual Disk 107GBMicrosoftBench 60%, 85 samples2x
RAM
29GBUnknownBench 65%, 119 samples26x
1x15GBUnknownBench 59%, 628 samples14x
44GBUnknownBench 23%, 6,316 samples12x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback