HP 750-177c

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Destroyer	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	74.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP 750-177c (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 2B47
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150924
Uptime	23.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 14 '20 at 05:31
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	78.1% Very good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 97.9 2-Core 231 76% 137 Pts	4-Core 396 8-Core 647 64% 522 Pts	64-Core 642 40% 642 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% PNY(196E 119D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.50 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	74.1% Very good	Lighting 92.3 Reflection 104 Parallax 97.1 75% 97.9 fps	MRender 87.6 Gravity 85.3 Splatting 90 72% 87.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61K1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 193 44 104 62 107 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Read 415 Write 92.8 Mixed 314 SusWrite 121 52% 236 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 66.8 4K Mixed 28.1 120% 42.2 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 196 173% 257 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 100%
PNY CS900 120GB-$15 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 43GB free Firmware: CS900211 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 216 229 227 268 229 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Read 376 Write 164 Mixed 286 SusWrite 225 59% 263 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 67.5 4K Mixed 25.2 104% 38.9 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 292 DQ Mixed 155 142% 214 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 87%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 169GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 148 147 148 147 149 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 114 Mixed 92.1 SusWrite 148 97% 132 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GB 4,871 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	60.9% Good	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 18.6 60% 21.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 21.3 56% 19.4 GB/s	Latency 75.8 53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 750-177c Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: HP 750-177c

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	42x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	24x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	2x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	2x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $78Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	2x
BX200 240GBCrucial $36Bench 76%, 36,559 samples	2x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $30Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	1x

RAM
M378B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 4,871 samples	29x
HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 53%, 7,869 samples	11x
M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 7,002 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16