Toshiba SATELLITE L750

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE L750  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Base Board Product Name
Memory6.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '17 at 09:10
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
44% Average
Memory 62
1-Core 58.5
2-Core 106
46% 75.6 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 152
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 315M
Toshiba(1179 FD50) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.44
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.31% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 2.69
Parallax 0.53
1% 1.53 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2.04
2% 2.11 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.31%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 100
Write 104
Mixed 91.5
74% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 0.36
4K Mixed 0.22
50% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 63%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB
23GB free, PID 0214
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 25.8
Write 20
Mixed 22.5
28% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.27
50% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273DH0-CH9 F3-10666CL9-4GBSQ 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.8% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 10.8
25% 8.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE L750 Builds (Compare 389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L750

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback