MSI H310M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7C13)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C13
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7C13)  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '20 at 09:27
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$92
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 118
2-Core 220
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 322
43% 323 Pts
64-Core 331
20% 331 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
MSI(1462 7C13) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8425
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
1.95% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 5.42
Parallax 3.97
0% 3.15 fps
MRender 6.76
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 9.48
6% 6.55 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.95%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 71 70 104 108 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 121
Write 118
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 85.8
73% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KT8GU4KE8 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.2% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 11.9
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 13.2
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7C13) Builds (Compare 881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VH PLUS (MS-7C13)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback