Sapphire WS-F2A85XM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardSapphire WS-F2A85XM  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '20 at 07:04
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FirePro A320 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 79.6
1-Core 70.1
2-Core 121
56% 90.3 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 211
28% 212 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro A300 Series Graphics Adapter
AMD(1002 9906) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.81% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 7.58
Parallax 7.16
6% 7.38 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 7.87
5% 6.36 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 5.81%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$68
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0125A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 371 366 107 123 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 445
Write 372
Mixed 364
SusWrite 226
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 29.7
108% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 202
157% 216 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
154GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 88 86 84 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 106
Write 112
Mixed 52
SusWrite 85.9
65% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-016.A00LF 99U5471-036.A00LF 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.5% Below average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 11.7
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 11.6
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback