Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive293% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '20 at 16:38
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 10600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 97.8
1-Core 151
2-Core 302
101% 184 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 933
94% 763 Pts
64-Core 1,163
72% 1,163 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 104%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Asus(1043 8727) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
108% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 134
Parallax 134
117% 137 fps
MRender 157
Gravity 117
Splatting 96.1
98% 123 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 108%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
357GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 944 667 661 655 650 660 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
293% Outstanding
Read 2,520
Write 2371
Mixed 1,691
SusWrite 706
407% 1,822 MB/s
4K Read 67.8
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 91.2
307% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,344
DQ Write 1,062
DQ Mixed 1,194
896% 1200 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 293%
Great: 340%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
28GB free
Firmware: M0CR070
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9759
Write 7,589
Mixed 9,008
1,957% 8,785 MB/s
4K Read 732
4K Write 630
4K Mixed 661
2,290% 675 MB/s
DQ Read 1,570
DQ Write 1367
DQ Mixed 1,477
1,105% 1,471 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 95%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB
428GB free
Firmware: ECFM22.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1491 1348 792 794 780 780 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 1,079
Write 995
Mixed 1,243
SusWrite 997
244% 1,079 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 86.1
299% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,501
DQ Write 1,187
DQ Mixed 1,362
1,014% 1350 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 256%
Great: 298%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
767GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 96 97 98 97 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 65.6
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 96.1
58% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
837GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 150 148 151 151 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 154
Write 123
Mixed 85
SusWrite 150
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 112%
Intenso Premium Line 32GB
30GB free, PID 8381
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 19 22 21 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 236
Write 46.8
Mixed 49.9
SusWrite 19.6
86% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 5.5
350% 7.73 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3811 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 46.5
MC Mixed 30.2
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 50.4
SC Mixed 33.6
103% 35.9 GB/s
Latency 46.9
85% 46.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 113%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X HERO Builds (Compare 3,688 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,116
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback