Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer Razer
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '20 at 16:29
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Memory 48.2
1-Core 24.7
2-Core 45.3
27% 39.4 Pts
4-Core 82
8-Core 126
13% 104 Pts
64-Core 120
7% 120 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 6755) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7212
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.35% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 53.6
Parallax 2.56
2% 19.5 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 4.91
3% 3.68 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.35%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-00000 256GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 294 277 295 295 272 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 802
Write 304
Mixed 308
SusWrite 286
94% 425 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 25
89% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 181
134% 179 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 144%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HDZ-2G3B1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
44.2% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 19.5
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,043 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback