Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus Strix GL504GM_GL504GM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GL504GM
Memory	25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200302
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '20 at 01:03
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	JAM-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Memory 81.4 1-Core 90.7 2-Core 182 68% 118 Pts	4-Core 285 8-Core 505 48% 395 Pts	64-Core 186 12% 186 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 86%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 19AE) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	3.85% Terrible	Lighting 2.53 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 7.44 2% 7.17 fps	MRender 6.43 Gravity 5.53 Splatting 13.1 7% 8.35 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.85% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 19AE) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.92 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	19.5% Very poor	Lighting 9.93 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 34 8% 18.5 fps	MRender 57.4 Gravity 43.3 Splatting 51.7 42% 50.8 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 463GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 922 657 909 819 525 523 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	143% Outstanding	Read 914 Write 1,358 Mixed 972 SusWrite 726 224% 992 MB/s	4K Read 46.1 4K Write 39.5 4K Mixed 42.6 145% 42.7 MB/s	DQ Read 700 DQ Write 68.7 DQ Mixed 124 156% 298 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 143% Great: 372%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 395GB free Firmware: 04.01A04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 65 68 63 69 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 67.1 Write 52.7 Mixed 40.4 SusWrite 66 42% 56.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.7 161% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 79%
Lacie Mobile Drive 4TB 254 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2TB free Firmware: 0003 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 109 106 93 102 99 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	47.9% Average	Read 63.9 Write 115 Mixed 77 SusWrite 102 66% 89.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.6 167% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GB 20,439 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	81.5% Excellent	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 33.8 MC Mixed 25.8 86% 30 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 28.9 SC Mixed 21.7 60% 21 GB/s	Latency 78.1 51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	505x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	279x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	242x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	149x
THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshibaBench 148%, 19,151 samples	90x
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	42x

RAM
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	198x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	44x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	26x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16