ADD TO PC
BUILD

Viewpaker B150M-D2VX-SI

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 65% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	92.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Viewpaker B150M-D2VX-SI (all builds)
Motherboard	Viewpaker B150M-D2VX-SI
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170105
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 10 '20 at 14:53
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Memory 83.4 1-Core 113 2-Core 231 80% 142 Pts	4-Core 426 8-Core 635 66% 531 Pts	64-Core 617 38% 617 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Zotac(19DA 2445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	92.4% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 137 Parallax 118 96% 124 fps	MRender 94.7 Gravity 121 Splatting 100 86% 105 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N600 120GB 215 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0921B SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 39 20 20 17 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	47.2% Average	Read 363 Write 123 Mixed 311 SusWrite 62.6 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 56.3 4K Mixed 8.7 73% 28.7 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 95.1 DQ Mixed 71.1 82% 145 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 93%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 931GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 104 103 105 105 104 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	60% Above average	Read 105 Write 98.5 Mixed 75.8 SusWrite 104 71% 95.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 76%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB 6,021 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 57GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 20 21 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Read 23.4 Write 7.5 Mixed 23 SusWrite 18.7 24% 18.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.3 77% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 859B CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 16GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.5% Good	MC Read 24.3 MC Write 24.7 MC Mixed 19 65% 22.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 19.9 56% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback