HP EliteBook 840 G1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteBook 840 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 198F
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141209
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJul 10 '20 at 11:56
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Memory 47.9
1-Core 23.7
2-Core 41.2
26% 37.6 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 234
24% 194 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 198F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
1.98% Terrible
Lighting 2.03
Reflection 3.46
Parallax 3.5
2% 3 fps
MRender 3.81
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 4.17
3% 3.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.98%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050V 500GB
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX0C1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 77 75 75 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
47% Average
Read 88
Write 81.3
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 75.6
51% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 47%
Great: 62%
IT1172 USB Flash Disk 8GB
5GB free, PID 1172
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 8.5 8.4 8.5 8.4 8.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.87% Terrible
Read 23
Write 10
Mixed 8.8
SusWrite 8.3
15% 12.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0
21% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.87%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
23.7% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 7.1
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 840 G1 Builds (Compare 328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 840 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback