Asus S551LB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 74% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus S551LB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK S551LB
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130923
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 10 '20 at 07:57
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 23%
CPU Throttled 74%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4500U-$393
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 125
60% 96 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 212
28% 212 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 130D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.46% Terrible
Lighting 3.73
Reflection 3.12
Parallax 6.5
3% 4.45 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.43
4% 4.92 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.46%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KINGSPEED 240GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 358 350 317 316 325 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 362
Write 199
Mixed 282
SusWrite 337
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 23.4
85% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 207
177% 258 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida Hynix HMT325S6CFR8A-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.3% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 10.7
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 11.1
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S551LB Builds (Compare 193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus S551LB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $393
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback