Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-US2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics44.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA78GM-US2H  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '20 at 06:54
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
53.8% Above average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 54.8
2-Core 109
49% 79.3 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 270
28% 227 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1236 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
44.8% Average
Lighting 54.4
Reflection 61.3
Parallax 66.9
44% 60.9 fps
MRender 63.7
Gravity 53
Splatting 52.7
46% 56.5 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 47 48 49 49 50 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.2% Average
Read 179
Write 127
Mixed 82.4
SusWrite 48
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 31
106% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 41.2
DQ Mixed 48.7
48% 78.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
466GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 121 122 123 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 112
Write 113
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 122
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.1% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 8.1
23% 8 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 5.8
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA78GM-US2H Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-US2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $125
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback