Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-US2H

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	44.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-US2H (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100804
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '20 at 10:47
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T 2,528 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Memory 73 1-Core 53.8 2-Core 107 49% 78 Pts	4-Core 182 8-Core 263 28% 222 Pts	64-Core 270 17% 270 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126 94,030 User benchmarks, average bench 40% XFX(1682 9470) CLim: 1236 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.5.1 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Lighting 54.4 Reflection 62 Parallax 71.4 44% 62.6 fps	MRender 63.5 Gravity 52.1 Splatting 52.5 45% 56 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03090004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 46 47 48 48 47 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.8% Below average	Read 245 Write 199 Mixed 153 SusWrite 47.8 36% 161 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 47.2 4K Mixed 30 69% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 46.8 DQ Mixed 92 68% 91.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 459GB free Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 120 122 123 122 123 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Read 113 Write 109 Mixed 68.3 SusWrite 122 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 190% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 88%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB 8,520 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 23GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 24.4 Write 17.4 Mixed 16.3 SusWrite 17.1 24% 18.8 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 2.6 168% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.8% Poor	MC Read 8.4 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 8 23% 8.13 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 7 20% 6.97 GB/s	Latency 94.6 42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-MA78GM-US2H Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-US2H

CPU
Phenom 9650AMD $125Bench 43%, 2,698 samples	6x
Phenom II X3 720AMDBench 48%, 2,612 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 3200ATIBench 1%, 5,730 samples	5x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	2x
Radeon HD 6450AMDBench 2%, 32,407 samples	2x

SSD
MKNSSDS2120GB 120GBMushkinBench 65%, 202 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	1x
S3512G 512GBSandiskBench 97%, 19,948 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	7x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	5x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $125

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16