Asrock Z270 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170517
Uptime9 Days
Run DateJul 09 '20 at 22:29
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 88.3
1-Core 142
2-Core 284
94% 172 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 542
70% 530 Pts
64-Core 536
33% 536 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
62.1% Good
Lighting 78.8
Reflection 83.1
Parallax 73.8
64% 78.6 fps
MRender 78
Gravity 71.2
Splatting 65.5
58% 71.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 881 746 710 697 681 677 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 2,226
Write 2,060
Mixed 1430
SusWrite 732
360% 1,612 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 81.6
264% 98.8 MB/s
DQ Read 967
DQ Write 435
DQ Mixed 392
373% 598 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 248%
Great: 355%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
16GB free
Firmware: EXT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 336
Write 282
Mixed 317
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 46.9
145% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 178
142% 200 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: MZ6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 128 128 128 128 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 130
Write 136
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 128
76% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.4
112% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 859B BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FBD2 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.9% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 24.4
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 27.1
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 1,198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Extreme4 - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $755
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback