MSI 870A-G46 (MS-7599)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7599
MotherboardMSI 870A-G46 (MS-7599)  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110323
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJul 08 '20 at 18:55
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPU1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
46.5% Average
Memory 77.7
1-Core 47.6
2-Core 59.5
43% 61.6 Pts
4-Core 87.9
8-Core 112
13% 99.9 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Gigabyte(1458 254C) 3GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.2% Below average
Lighting 40.2
Reflection 28.9
Parallax 49.8
33% 39.6 fps
MRender 27.5
Gravity 39
Splatting 35.9
28% 34.1 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 32%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 83 88 89 89 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 95
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 85.4
63% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD34G13332 PSD34G133320 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.17 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870A-G46 (MS-7599) Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 870A-G46 (MS-7599)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback