Asus P8Z68-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory17.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '20 at 16:12
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 176
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 500
52% 418 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Lighting 70.1
Reflection 69.9
Parallax 87.9
57% 75.9 fps
MRender 71.2
Gravity 69.3
Splatting 58.3
54% 66.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 234 225 230 231 237 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
65% Good
Read 312
Write 223
Mixed 252
SusWrite 230
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 31.6
102% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 146
110% 147 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 65%
Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
77GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,260
Write 4162
Mixed 4,344
952% 4,255 MB/s
4K Read 196
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 137
540% 153 MB/s
DQ Read 454
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 352
266% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
474GB free
Firmware: ML6OA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 92 91 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 74.8
Write 72
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 90.4
52% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 73%
EPSON Storage 4GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.6 3.8 3.7 3.8 3.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
2.03% Terrible
Read 7
Write 3.5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 3.7
6% 4.62 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 2.03%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.2% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 13.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13.8
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO Builds (Compare 1,456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $985
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback