Asus P8Z68-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory16.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '20 at 08:45
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 203
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 535
55% 442 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Lighting 70.9
Reflection 70.4
Parallax 96.9
58% 79.4 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 71
Splatting 58.8
54% 67.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 29 28 31 32 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
91GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 438 435 434 435 436 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 460
Write 128
Mixed 380
SusWrite 422
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 30.8
108% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 214
165% 227 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 133%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
495GB free
Firmware: ML6OA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 19 53 79 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 82
Write 11
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 44.6
30% 40.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO Builds (Compare 1,456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $985
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback