Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics94.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '20 at 15:32
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 94.7
1-Core 105
2-Core 191
77% 130 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 512
54% 430 Pts
64-Core 507
31% 507 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 84CA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5100
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 118
Parallax 113
99% 118 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 104
Splatting 84.9
86% 108 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 169 106 6.9 46 170 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 482
Write 466
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 124
63% 285 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 32.9
52% 13.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
3TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 199 200 199 198 199 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 134
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 197
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
440GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 145 147 147 146 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 155
Write 149
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 146
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
228% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 109%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
165GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 64 66 67 67 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 99
Write 94.7
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 65.1
57% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 83%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 8GB
4GB free, PID 1167
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 10 10 10 10 9.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
4.98% Terrible
Read 19.3
Write 9.5
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 9.9
15% 12 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.98%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
58% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 18.5
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 17.6
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,660 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback