Gigabyte GA-G1.SNIPER M7-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte G1.SNIPER M7
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G1.SNIPER M7-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 08 '20 at 04:59
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$38
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 115
2-Core 201
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 300
36% 277 Pts
64-Core 301
19% 301 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 21.1
15% 23.5 fps
MRender 28.3
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 33.5
22% 25.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$60
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 6.3 2.1 57 163 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 365
Write 311
Mixed 222
SusWrite 81
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 12.4
52% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 64.7
DQ Mixed 36.8
42% 72.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 55%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
512GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 134 128 120 119 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 154
Write 149
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 124
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK4GX4M1A2400C16 Samsung M378A1K43BB2-CRC 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.5% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 18.5
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 20
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G1.SNIPER M7-CF Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.SNIPER M7-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $214
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback