Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-5400K APU-$120 7,836 User benchmarks, average bench 40% P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Memory 83.6 1-Core 72.9 2-Core 109 57% 88.4 Pts	4-Core 106 8-Core 110 14% 108 Pts	64-Core 107 7% 107 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7540D 4,337 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 7721) 768MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	3.68% Terrible	Lighting 4.63 Reflection 4.81 Parallax 3.97 4% 4.47 fps	MRender 4.19 Gravity 3.43 Splatting 4.91 4% 4.18 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.68% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB 15,567 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 139 70 70 72 71 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Read 389 Write 234 Mixed 299 SusWrite 113 58% 259 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 59.5 4K Mixed 26.8 114% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 142 107% 145 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 88%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95 20,246 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 51GB free Firmware: 3.AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 80 80 80 80 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	46.8% Average	Read 83.2 Write 60.2 Mixed 46.2 SusWrite 79.9 50% 67.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair 1 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 3 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.1% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 9.1 27% 9.43 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 11.7 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 37%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	3x

RAM
1600 CL9 Series 1600 CL9 Series 8GBUnknownBench 37%, 220 samples	4x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	3x
1866 CL10 Series 1866 CL10 Series 16GBUnknownBench 36%, 224 samples	3x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $538