Acer Veriton M2630G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Veriton M2630G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer H81-M1
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '20 at 05:32
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 88.6
1-Core 116
2-Core 230
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 597
64% 508 Pts
64-Core 589
36% 589 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Device(1B0A 0164) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3257
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 90 83 65 76 49 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.1% Above average
Read 251
Write 151
Mixed 211
SusWrite 81.4
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 24.8
106% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 89.3
DQ Mixed 63.8
61% 97.3 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ABA200V 2TB
510GB free
Firmware: MZ4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 136 133 133 135 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 138
Write 142
Mixed 32.3
SusWrite 135
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.4
108% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AM2L16BC4R1-B0WS Kingston 99P5471-004.A01LF 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.1% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 14.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M2630G Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M2630G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback