Gigabyte GA-B365M DS3H WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B365M DS3H WIFI  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '20 at 20:55
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 58%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 79.2
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 228
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 639
67% 539 Pts
64-Core 646
40% 646 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.6% Above average
Lighting 78.2
Reflection 73.5
Parallax 68.9
64% 73.5 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 70.5
Splatting 54.5
51% 64 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 80 50 39 33 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 423
Write 136
Mixed 239
SusWrite 57.1
47% 214 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 10.4
29% 9.6 MB/s
DQ Read 14.1
DQ Write 28.4
DQ Mixed 15.8
14% 19.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
619GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 132 152 156 154 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 164
Write 166
Mixed 109
SusWrite 136
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
73% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD480E82-2666 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
36.6% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 11.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 10.5
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B365M DS3H WIFI Builds (Compare 3,219 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B365M DS3H WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $352
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback