Asrock N68-VS3 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive27% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock N68-VS3 FX  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111114
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 04 '20 at 20:58
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 84.1
1-Core 48.3
2-Core 94.5
50% 75.6 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 231
25% 198 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57%
Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBBU120G1 120GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z310
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 42 42 38 51 51 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
27% Poor
Read 225
Write 70.6
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 44.7
20% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 5.5
47% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 22.2
DQ Write 66.1
DQ Mixed 13
19% 33.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27%
Great: 32%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
436GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 166 171 174 176 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 121
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 173
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
WD WD2000JD-00HBB0 200GB
42GB free
Firmware: 08.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 27
Write 33.5
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 30.2
20% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 32%
Samsung S2 Portable 500GB
464GB free, PID 1f05
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4.9 4.7 5.3 5.3 5.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
4.92% Terrible
Read 17
Write 5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 5.1
10% 8.45 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 4.92%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 8GB
533, 533 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.9% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.7
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-VS3 FX Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-VS3 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $138
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback