Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte AB350M-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '20 at 15:59
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 109
2-Core 208
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 626
65% 522 Pts
64-Core 850
53% 850 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Zotac(19DA 5511) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 125
Parallax 130
108% 129 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 117
Splatting 103
105% 133 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 51 64 82 62 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 494
Write 46
Mixed 64.9
SusWrite 66.1
36% 168 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 30
88% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 50.9
DQ Mixed 42
55% 105 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
816GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 143 145 145 145 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 117
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 144
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/8G BLS8G4D26BFSE.16FBD2 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 31.1
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 26.7
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback