Acer Veriton M680G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Acer Veriton M680G (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Veriton M680G
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100527
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 03 '20 at 14:05
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	71.9% Very good	Memory 93.2 1-Core 78.1 2-Core 162 67% 111 Pts	4-Core 278 8-Core 385 42% 331 Pts	64-Core 382 24% 382 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 74%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 859GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 224 224 225 229 228 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	67.3% Good	Read 245 Write 234 Mixed 233 SusWrite 225 53% 234 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 53.6 4K Mixed 33.8 112% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 197 148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 133%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 72GB free Firmware: DXT08B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 224 224 205 113 95 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.4% Average	Read 176 Write 209 Mixed 147 SusWrite 181 40% 178 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 47.9 4K Mixed 17.8 74% 27.7 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 52.5 79% 150 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 401GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 91 89 91 92 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 95.3 Write 95.3 Mixed 63.3 SusWrite 90.5 63% 86.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 69%
ASMT 2105 320GB 226 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 296GB free, PID 5136 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 30.2 Write 22.5 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 13.8 28% 22.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 43%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 2TB free, PID 1048 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 29.7 Write 22.5 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 13.7 28% 22 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 44%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB 8,402 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 3.5TB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Read 30.2 Write 22 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 13.6 28% 22 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.9 135% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 9905471-006.A01LF 4x4GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1334 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	41.5% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 13.1 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 11.8 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 61.7 65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Veriton M680G Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M680G

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	28x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	22x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	11x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	13x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	6x
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples	5x

SSD
INTENSO 512GBBench 75%, 2,578 samples	7x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
GU512303EP0202 0707 GU512303EP0202 12GBUnknownBench 39%, 18 samples	8x
99U5584-005.A00LF 0198 99U5584-005.A00LF 0198 9905474-060.A00LF 0198 99U5584-005.A00LF 16GBUnknownBench 40%, 5 samples	5x
GU512303EP0202 2x2GBUnknownBench 27%, 1,099 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $70

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16