Dell Precision T7600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemDell Precision T7600
MotherboardDell Precision T7600  (all builds)
Memory248.4 GB free of 256 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '17 at 04:31
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 51
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 189
61% 113 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 695
61% 520 Pts
64-Core 1699
105% 1699 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.62
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.51% Terrible
Lighting 7.53
Reflection 8.88
Parallax 6.38
6% 7.6 fps
MRender 9.95
Gravity 8.1
Splatting 8.57
7% 8.87 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.51%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 12TB
696GB free
Firmware: 8.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 54% Great: 102%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 1TB
536GB free
Firmware: 8.00
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 94%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 1TB
385GB free
Firmware: 8.00
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 94%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 1TB
253GB free
Firmware: 8.00
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 94%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 1TB
237GB free
Firmware: 8.00
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 94%
Dell PERC H700 250GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.10
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 69% Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung-00CE M393B2G70QH0-YK0 16x16GB
16 of 16 slots used
256GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 70.7
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 34.1
135% 47.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T7600 Builds (Compare 701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T7600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback