HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160404
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Jul 03 '20 at 00:36
Run Duration	264 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 89.3 1-Core 96.8 2-Core 187 73% 124 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 354 48% 356 Pts	64-Core 351 22% 351 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% EVGA(3842 3619) 2GB CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.83% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 2.85 Parallax 0.59 2% 1.91 fps	MRender 2.38 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 1.83 2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.83% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hua722020ala330 EIT 2TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: JKAOA33B SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 61 75 81 79 99 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 108 Write 104 Mixed 48.6 SusWrite 77.7 62% 84.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 72%
Seagate ST3400820AS 400GB 872 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 83GB free Firmware: 3.AHG SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 46 46 50 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 55.2 Write 23.7 Mixed 39.7 SusWrite 47.1 31% 41.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 43%
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250 11,608 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 146GB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 46 46 51 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	Read 65.9 Write 70.9 Mixed 42.6 SusWrite 47.4 42% 56.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1 166% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 CT102464BD160B.M16 16GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	51% Above average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,778 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	688x
Core i7-2600Intel $135Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	600x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	318x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	143x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	87x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	57x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 20 samples	14x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16