HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1494
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160404
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJul 03 '20 at 00:02
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 180
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 342
45% 338 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
EVGA(3842 3619) 2GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.78% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.81
2% 2.18 fps
MRender 2.29
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 1.83
2% 2.12 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.78%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hua722020ala330 EIT 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: JKAOA33B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 71 78 84 91 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 105
Write 111
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 84.5
64% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 72%
Seagate ST3400820AS 400GB
83GB free
Firmware: 3.AHG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 41 43 45 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 55.2
Write 49.3
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 42.5
34% 46.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 43%
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250
146GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 41 43 46 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 65.8
Write 67.8
Mixed 42
SusWrite 43
40% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 CT102464BD160B.M16 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,780 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback