Asus Z87-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics64.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z87-A  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '20 at 23:46
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 212
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 584
59% 478 Pts
64-Core 585
36% 585 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
EVGA(3842 6264) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.5% Good
Lighting 80.6
Reflection 81
Parallax 70.7
66% 77.4 fps
MRender 73.7
Gravity 75.5
Splatting 78
62% 75.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$199
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 138 113 115 109 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 413
Mixed 402
SusWrite 152
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 52.3
184% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 301
228% 308 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 100%
Great: 122%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
176GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 399 411 430 431 429 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 481
Mixed 443
SusWrite 408
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 68.1
224% 79.2 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 97.6
134% 244 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 130%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
261GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 398 411 429 431 429 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 483
Mixed 440
SusWrite 408
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 64.5
212% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 296
224% 300 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
234GB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 117 119 118 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 117
Write 84
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 118
73% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 114%
SMI USB DISK 16GB
10GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4 4.9 4.1 4.1 4.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
7.67% Terrible
Read 23.5
Write 8.3
Mixed 9
SusWrite 4.4
13% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
85% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.67%
Great: 35%
ASMT ASM105x 250GB
3GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 5.9 5.9 6 6 5.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 24.8
Write 22.5
Mixed 24
SusWrite 5.9
25% 19.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 7.8
556% 7.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 266%
WD Elements 25A3 5TB
1TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 5.9 5.9 5.9 6 6.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 20.8
Write 20.3
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 6
22% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
129% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 66%
ASMT ASM105x 120GB
112GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 5.9 5.9 6 6 6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 24.5
Write 23.3
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 5.9
25% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 5.8
490% 7 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 139%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1.5TB
675GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6 5.9 6 6 5.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.85% Terrible
Read 24.5
Write 23.3
Mixed 18
SusWrite 5.9
23% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 9.85%
Great: 42%
WD easystore 25FC 2TB
608GB free, PID 25fc
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.9 5.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.48% Terrible
Read 20.3
Write 19
Mixed 22
SusWrite 5.8
22% 16.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
36% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 6.48%
Great: 62%
Seagate Expansion+ Desk 3TB
377GB free, PID 3341
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 6 5.9 6 6 6.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.87% Terrible
Read 24
Write 23.5
Mixed 22
SusWrite 5.9
25% 18.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 9.87%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL10 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
58.7% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 18.1
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 19.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-A Builds (Compare 2,927 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Z87-A - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $627
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback